Walbecaoker Pro Full specifications: measured performance price and specs
Walbecaoker presents itself as a brand designed in Europe with assembly in Asia. Its first product, the Pro, focuses on three main arguments: compactness when folded (12 cm thick), a relatively contained 750 W motor, and a Bluetooth companion app called Walbecaoker Connect.
Released in March 2026, the Walbecaoker Pro enters a market already well-served by references like Decathlon's Domyos W500 or Sportstech models. Priced at €379, it targets the mid-range segment and offers an interesting compromise between footprint, maximum speed and noise.
Technical specifications
| Brand | Walbecaoker |
|---|---|
| Model | Pro |
| Speed | 1 – 6 km/h |
| Walking surface | 120 x 40 cm |
| Weight | 26 kg |
| Max load | 110 kg |
| Folded thickness | 12 cm |
| Motor | 750 W |
| Max noise | ≤ 45 dB |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Warranty | 2 years |
| Price | 379 € |
On the technical side, the Walbecaoker Pro offers an adjustable speed from 1 to 6 km/h, which corresponds to slow to brisk walking — this is not a running treadmill. The walking surface measures 120 cm long by 40 cm wide, which is in the higher average of the under-desk segment. The maximum supported load is rated at 110 kg.
Compared to Decathlon's Domyos W500, the Walbecaoker Pro plays on a slightly different positioning. The W500 is more oriented toward running with a higher maximum speed and a longer surface, while the Walbecaoker Pro is explicitly designed for office walking. For an exclusively professional and sedentary use, the Walbecaoker's compromise may seem relevant.
Compared to other models in the office-walking segment, the Walbecaoker Pro sits in the average on essential characteristics. Its €379 price puts it in direct competition with references like the Sportstech DFT200 or the Citysports WP2, without a decisive advantage on paper. Real differentiation will have to come from the usage experience and actual build quality.
As it stands, the Walbecaoker Pro appears to be an honest product in the under-desk treadmill segment, without offering major differentiation from established references. Its main interest lies in the price/format ratio for users looking for a discreet and quiet device to integrate into a workspace.
Several points deserve attention before purchase. First, the lack of incline limits the variety of sessions and the intensity of muscular effort. Second, the 26 kg weight without mentioned wheels makes regular moving complicated, which partially contradicts the compactness promise. Finally, since the brand is new, we still lack user feedback on the durability of the motor and belt after several months of intensive use.